Tolvaptan therapy for edema in patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Tolvaptan is a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed to alleviate edema associated with renal diseases. However, the clinical benefits of tolvaptan in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of tolvaptan in managing edema caused by CKD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy and treatment regimen of tolvaptan were assessed in a cohort of 96 patients with renal edema and CKD. During the treatment, the patients' creatinine (CR), uric acid (UA), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were monitored as important indicators of kidney function. Coagulation-associated molecules including fibrinogen, D-dimer, and fibrin degradation products (FDPs) were measured. Electrolyte disorders and acute kidney injury were closely monitored. Tolvaptan was administered at a daily dose of 7.5 mg, and 30 mg of edoxaban was administered to manage deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: During the course of tolvaptan therapy, the eGFR of the patients was not declined. Edema was eliminated in 82.18% of patients. Proteinuria was reduced in the patients (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in serum sodium levels throughout treatment, and no significant difference was observed in blood volume between the end of treatment and baseline levels. Importantly, acute kidney injury did not occur, and renal edema and deep vein thrombosis were successfully treated. CONCLUSION: As long as a rational treatment regimen is followed, tolvaptan is a safe and effective diuretic for treating edema in CKD, even in the late stages of CKD without reducing residual renal function in the patients.

No major effect of dopamine receptor 1/5 antagonist SCH-23390 on epileptic activity in the Tg2576 mouse model of amyloidosis.

The excitation-inhibition imbalance manifesting as epileptic activities in Alzheimer's disease is gaining more and more attention, and several potentially involved cellular and molecular pathways are currently under investigation. Based on in vitro studies, dopamine D1-type receptors in the anterior cingulate cortex and the hippocampus have been proposed to participate in this peculiar co-morbidity in mouse models of amyloidosis. Here, we tested the implication of dopaminergic transmission in vivo in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease by monitoring epileptic activities via intracranial EEG before and after treatment with dopamine antagonists. Our results show that neither the D1-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 nor the D2-like dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol reduces the frequency of epileptic activities. While requiring further investigation, our results indicate that on a systemic level, dopamine receptors are not significantly contributing to epilepsy observed in vivo in this mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

The efficacy and safety of ivabradine hydrochloride in hemodialysis patients with chronic heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: There is little evidence for ivabradine hydrochloride in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: In this open-label prospective interventional trial of hemodialysis patients with chronic heart failure, during 12 weeks of treatment, changes in Heart rate (HR), frequency of dialysis-related hypotension were examined, and we investigated health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and adverse effects. RESULTS: 18 patients from 6 facilities were enrolled in the study. HR significantly decreased over time, from 87 ± 12.61/min at baseline to 75.85 ± 8.91/min (p = 0.0003), and systolic blood pressure also increased significantly (p < 0.0001). The frequency of dialysis-related hypotension was markedly reduced (p = 0.0001). The HR-QOL survey showed significant improvements in Social Functioning among others (p = 0.0178). No specific adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Ivabradine hydrochloride improved dialysis-related hypotension. Furthermore, the HR-QOL improvement effect were suggested. These results demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of ivabradine hydrochloride.

Lorcaserin: Worthy of Further Insights? Results from Recent Research.

Lorcaserin is a 3-benzazepine that binds 5-HT2C serotonin receptors in the hypothalamus, where it mediates lack of hunger and/or satiety, and in the ventral tegmental area, the site of origin of the mesolimbic and mesocortical dopaminergic projections, which mediate pleasure and reward. The drug has been first developed for the treatment of obesity, where it has shown efficacy, and subsequently trialed to counter substance use (mostly cocaine, cannabis, opioids, and nicotine) and craving, but showed inconsistent effects. Since 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration obtained that the drug was voluntarily withdrawn from the US market on the grounds that its long-term use was found to be associated with a greater incidence of some types of cancer. Provided it can show to be free from cancerogenic effects, ongoing research suggests that lorcaserin may have therapeutic potential for a variety of disorders and conditions beyond obesity. Since 5-HT2C receptors are involved in many diversified physiological functions (mood, feeding, reproductive behavior, neuronal processes related to impulsiveness, and modulating reward-related mechanisms) this drug has the potential to treat different central nervous system conditions, such as depression and schizophrenia.

Interactions between lorcaserin and opioids: Ventilation and food-versus-drug choice.

Lorcaserin, a selective serotonin 2C (5-HT2C) receptor agonist, was approved for treating obesity and has been investigated for treating substance use disorders including those involving opioids. Although lorcaserin was withdrawn from the market, interest in the therapeutic potential of drugs acting at 5-HT2C receptors continues, supporting the need to further characterize potential adverse effects especially when combined with drugs of abuse. This study examined acute effects of lorcaserin on opioid-induced ventilatory depression, which is the primary cause of overdose, and opioid self-administration, which models factors contributing to opioid abuse, in male and female rhesus monkeys. In one group (n = 4), effects of morphine (0.178 to 5.6 mg/kg, s.c.), fentanyl (0.0032 to 0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), and lorcaserin (0.1 to 1.78 mg/kg, s.c.) alone as well as effects of lorcaserin with each opioid on ventilation were determined using head plethysmography. Another group (n = 5) responded under a food versus fentanyl (0.1 to 3.2 µg/kg/infusion, i.v.) choice procedure, and lorcaserin (0.32 to 1.78 mg/kg, i.v.) was given as a pretreatment. Lorcaserin dose-dependently decreased minute volume to below 70 % of baseline when administered alone and increased the potency of morphine and fentanyl. Consistent with previous studies, lorcaserin failed to alter choice of fentanyl over food. This study demonstrates the novel finding that lorcaserin alone decreases ventilation and enhances the ventilatory-depressant effects of opioids. Taken together with previous studies, these results suggest that combining a 5-HT2C receptor agonist such as lorcaserin with an opioid could increase the risk of ventilatory depression without the benefit of decreasing abuse.

Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy Efficacy in Comorbid Medical Populations: Secondary Analysis of the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare medication efficacy in participants with medical comorbidities who smoke in the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) trial, a double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled randomized controlled trial. AIMS AND METHODS: Participants were from the U.S. cohort of the main trial and randomized (1:1:1:1) to varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patch, or placebo for 12 weeks with follow-up through week 24. Medical comorbidity data were derived from the baseline medical screening questionnaire and categorized into four subgroups (cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes). Within each comorbidity, generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the association between treatment and continuous abstinence rates from weeks 9-12 to 9-24. Similar models were used to test the effect of number of comorbidities on abstinence. RESULTS: Varenicline resulted in the highest week 12 abstinence rates across all pharmacotherapies and compared to placebo in all comorbidity subgroups: Cardiac (40.0% vs. 3.6%; odds ratios [OR] = 23.3 [5.1-107.1]), respiratory (24.7% vs. 12.8%; OR = 2.2 [1.3-3.8]), vascular (29.1% vs. 10.4%; OR = 3.6 [2.3-5.7]), and diabetes (30.9% vs. 8.3%; OR = 6.5 [2.3-19.0]). This was maintained at week 24 for those with cardiac (23.3% vs. 1.8%; OR = 21.7 [2.7-178.2]), vascular (18.9% vs. 7.1%; OR = 3.1 [1.8-5.3]), and diabetes (20.6% vs. 4.2%; OR = 8.4 [2.1-33.7]) comorbidities. Treatment contrasts within some comorbidity subgroups revealed superior efficacy of varenicline over other pharmacotherapies. All pharmacotherapies increased the odds of abstinence regardless of number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with manageable cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes conditions to quit smoking, supporting recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as first-line pharmacotherapy. Bupropion and NRT demonstrated efficacy for some comorbidity subgroups. IMPLICATIONS: This secondary analysis of the EAGLES trial demonstrated that varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes diagnoses to quit smoking. This demonstration of varenicline efficacy among individuals with comorbid medical conditions supports recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as a first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation.

Tolvaptan and urea in paediatric hyponatraemia.

BACKGROUND: The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) is usually treated with fluid restriction. This can be challenging in patients with obligate fluid intake for nutrition or medication. Pharmaceutical treatment with tolvaptan and urea is available but minimal paediatric data are available. We review the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan and urea in paediatric patients with SIADH. METHODS: Retrospective review of paediatric inpatients with clinical diagnosis of SIADH. Patients were identified from pharmacy records based on tolvaptan and urea prescriptions. Relevant information was extracted from patient electronic records. The main outcome measures included the number of days to sodium normalisation, the daily change in plasma sodium concentration, and the maximum increase of plasma sodium concentration in 24 h. Reported side effects were captured. RESULTS: Thirteen patients received tolvaptan and six urea. Five patients had both agents (tolvaptan converted to urea). Tolvaptan led to plasma sodium normalisation in 10/13 (77%) within 6 days (median 2.5 days, range [1, 6]), with a median change of sodium concentration of 7 mmol/L (- 1, 14) within the first 24 h of treatment. Three patients experienced a change in plasma sodium > 10 mmol/l/day but had no apparent side effects. Urea led to sodium normalisation in 5/6 (83%) patients. The median number of days to normalisation with urea was 2 (1, 10) with a median change of plasma sodium concentration of 2 mmol/L (- 1, 6) within the first 24 h. All patients tolerated tolvaptan and/or urea without unexpected side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan and urea appear to be safe and effective when fluid restriction is challenging in paediatric SIADH. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of stroke and myocardial infarction prevention in hypertensive patients: Markov model based on the ACCOMPLISH trial.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the pharmacoeconomics of amlodipine combined with benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril in the treatment of hypertension using a Markov model to provide an evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we constructed two types of Markov model using data from the ACCOMPLISH (Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension) trial to dynamically simulate the development of hypertension. The models were subjected to rollback analysis and cohort analysis to obtain the cost and effectiveness of the two drug regimens in preventing stroke and myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients. We conducted sensitivity analysis to determine the stability of the results. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness of amlodipine combined with benazepril was 66,196.97 RMB with 6.59 QALYs and that of hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril was 74,588.50 RMB with 6.46 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of hydrochlorothiazide + benazepril was -64,550.23 compared with amlodipine + benazepril. The amlodipine + benazepril regimen was therefore more cost-effective than hydrochlorothiazide combined with benazepril. The sensitivity analysis results showed that the model was robust. CONCLUSION: Compared with the hydrochlorothiazide + benazepril treatment regimen, the amlodipine + benazepril regimen showed greater economic benefits.

A retrospective study on tolvaptan prescription in clinical practice in patients with syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) using the Japanese claims database.

We aimed to survey the status of tolvaptan administration in routine clinical practice since the approval of a novel indication for treating syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in Japan. Data from a population of 3,152 patients aged ≥18 years and diagnosed with SIADH between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 were extracted from a Japanese database. Tolvaptan was administered to 586 patients while 2,566 patients were followed up without tolvaptan. In the tolvaptan-treated group, the standard initial doses were 3.75 mg and 7.5 mg in 290 (49.5%) and 250 (42.7%) patients, respectively. The dose was increased in 112 (38.6%) and 71 (28.4%) and decreased in 8 (2.8%) and 46 (18.4%) of patients with 3.75 and 7.5 mg initial doses, respectively. Of the total 586 SIADH patients treated with tolvaptan, serum sodium concentrations were analyzed in 60 patients. In both treatment groups of 3.75 and 7.5 mg initial doses, the serum sodium concentration was elevated from the second day of treatment and reached 135 mEq/L on the fourth day, which was maintained for 2 weeks. Rapid correction of hyponatremia (>10 mEq/L increase in serum sodium concentration over 1 day or >18 mEq/L increase over 2 days) occurred in 26.7% patients with a 7.5 mg initial dose (4 of 15 patients) but not in the patients with a 3.75 mg initial dose (n = 16), suggesting that an initial dose of 3.75 mg of tolvaptan may be a better choice for the safe and proper correction of hyponatremia.

Effects of door-to-tolvaptan time on short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute heart failure.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of door-to-tolvaptan (D2T) time on short-term urine volume and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with AHF, treated with tolvaptan at two hospitals, were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. The D2T time was defined as the time elapsed from the arrival of a patient at a participating hospital to the first administration of tolvaptan. The group with the D2T time within 6 h was defined as the 'early group'. The primary outcome was 48-h urine volume. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and worsening renal function (WRF) incidence. A restricted cubic spline model was used to evaluate the presence of a nonlinear association between the D2T time and 48-h urine volume and the odds ratio of WRF incidence. Our study included a total of 138 patients with AHF who were started on tolvaptan after hospitalization. The median D2T time was 5.3 h (interquartile range: 3.0-31.9 h). Seventy-four patients (53.6%) were classified to be in the early group. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups: mean age (85.4 ± 9.6 years vs. 84.5 ± 9.5 years; P = 0.59) and male sex (n = 22 [33.3%] vs. n = 29 [46%]; P = 0.16), except that patients in the early group had higher systolic blood pressure than those in the delayed group (138.2 ± 22.9 vs. 125.7 ± 21.7; P = 0.001). The initial tolvaptan dose in the delayed group was much lower than that in the early group (7.5 [7.5, 7.5] vs. 7.5 [5.6, 7.5] mg; P = 0.01). Total urine volume in 48 h did not differ in the early and delayed groups (4113 ± 1758 mL vs. 4201 ± 1893 mL; P = 0.80). The relationship between D2T time and total urine volume within 48 h increased slightly, with a peak at a D2T time of 15 h, and gradually decreased, thereafter. In-hospital death and the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (n = 1, 1.3% vs. n = 4, 6.3%; P = 0.18, and 5.0 [12.0, 30.0] vs. 22.0 [14.5, 30.0] days; P = 0.17, respectively). Notably, the restricted cubic spline model for the odds ratio of WRF incidence increased as the D2T time was delayed (P for effect<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The shorter D2T time did not affect the short-term urine volume and in-hospital outcomes but reduced the risk of WRF incidence in patients with AHF.

Effect of tolvaptan on hyponatremia in a dog with syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone.

A 1-year-old spayed female Miniature Schnauzer had chronic hyponatremia, accompanied by polyuria and polydipsia. Blood tests and urinalysis revealed severe hyponatremia, low plasma osmolality with euvolemia, and increased sodium excretion in urine. Hypothyroidism and hypoadrenocorticism were ruled out as causes. These findings led to the diagnosis of syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed dilation of the lateral ventricles, indicating severe hydrocephalus. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist commonly used in human SIADH, was administered along with water restriction. This treatment resulted in a consistent increase in plasma sodium levels without any adverse effects. This case report represents the first documented evidence of the therapeutic efficacy of tolvaptan in treating SIADH in a dog.

Pelabresib (CPI-0610): An Exciting Novel Drug for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, megakaryocyte atypia, and inflammatory cytokine overproduction, resulting in progressive cytopenias, splenomegaly, and high symptom burden. Current backbone of care includes JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy, which offers limited benefits and significant discontinuation rates. Targeting the epigenetic modifiers bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins is a novel approach for harnessing the expression of genes involved in critical oncogenic signalling pathways implicated in MF and other malignancies. Here, we review preclinical and clinical data on Pelabresib (CPI-0610), an investigational oral small-molecule potent BET-inhibitor being explored in MF. RECENT FINDINGS: BET inhibition has been shown to target multiple MF driver mechanisms in preclinical studies, with synergistic results using combination therapy with JAKi. Pelabresib is currently being evaluated in the phase II MANIFEST study as monotherapy and in combination with ruxolitinib for MF. Interim data showed favourable responses in symptoms and spleen volume after 24 weeks of treatment, with correlated improvements in bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele fraction reduction. Based on these encouraging results, the Phase III MANIFEST-2 study was initiated. Pelabresib offers a much-needed innovative treatment approach for patients with MF, either as monotherapy or in combination with the current standard of care.

Time to benefit of heart rate reduction with ivabradine in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: In the SHIFT (Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial, ISRCTN70429960) study, ivabradine reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalizations in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in sinus rhythm and with a heart rate (HR) ≥70 bpm. In this study, we sought to determine the clinical significance of the time durations of HR reduction and the significant treatment effect on outcomes among patients with HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The time to statistically significant reduction of the primary outcome (HF hospitalization and cardiovascular death) and its components, all-cause death, and HF death, were assessed in a post-hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial in the overall population (HR ≥70 bpm) and at HR ≥75 bpm, representing the approved label in many countries. Compared to placebo, the primary outcome and HF hospitalizations were significantly reduced at 102 days, while there was no effect on cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and HF death at HR ≥70 bpm. In the population with a baseline HR ≥75 bpm, a reduction of the primary outcome occurred after 67 days, HF hospitalization after 78 days, cardiovascular death after 169 days, death from HF after 157 days and all-cause death after 169 days. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivabradine should not be deferred in patients in sinus rhythm with a HR of ≥70 bpm to reduce the primary outcome and HF hospitalizations, in particular in patients with HR ≥75 bpm. At HR ≥75 bpm, the time to risk reduction was shorter for reduction of hospitalization and mortality outcomes in patients with HFrEF after initiation of guideline-directed medication, including beta-blockers at maximally tolerated doses.

Efficacy and safety of combination behavioral activation for smoking cessation and varenicline for treating tobacco dependence among individuals with current or past major depressive disorder: A 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of depression-related psychological factors related to smoking behavior may improve rates of cessation among adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study measured the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of behavioral activation for smoking cessation (BASC), varenicline and their combination. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: This study used a randomized, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial design comparing BASC versus standard behavioral treatment (ST) and varenicline versus placebo, taking place in research clinics at two urban universities in the United States. Participants comprised 300 hundred adult smokers with current or past MDD. INTERVENTIONS: BASC integrated behavioral activation therapy and ST to increase engagement in rewarding activities by reducing avoidance, withdrawal and inactivity associated with depression. ST was based on the 2008 PHS Clinical Practice Guideline. Both treatments consisted of eight 45-min sessions delivered between weeks 1 and 12. Varenicline and placebo were administered for 12 weeks between weeks 2 and 14. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were bioverified intent-to-treat (ITT) 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 27 weeks and adverse events (AEs). FINDINGS: No significant interaction was detected between behavioral treatment and pharmacotherapy at 27 weeks (χ2 (1) = 0.19, P = 0.67). BASC and ST did not differ (χ2 (1) = 0.43, P = 0.51). Significant differences in ITT abstinence rates (χ2 (1) = 4.84, P = 0.03) emerged among pharmacotherapy arms (16.2% for varenicline, 7.5% for placebo), with results favoring varenicline over placebo (rate ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.08, 4.30). All significant differences in AE rates after start of medication were higher for placebo than varenicline. CONCLUSION: A randomized trial in smokers with major depressive disorder found that varenicline improved smoking abstinence versus placebo at 27 weeks without elevating rates of adverse events. Behavioral activation for smoking cessation did not outperform standard behavioral treatment, with or without adjunctive varenicline therapy.

[Smoking, heated tobacco products, alcohol and diabetes mellitus (update 2023)]. / Rauchen, erhitzte Tabakprodukte, Alkohol und Diabetes mellitus (Update 2023).

Smoking and second-hand smoke strongly increase incidence of diabetes and probability for its complications. Smoking cessation can lead to weight gain and increased diabetes risk; however, it decreases cardiovascular and total mortality. A basal diagnostics (Fagerström Test, exhaled CO) is the basis for successful smoking cessation. Supporting medication include Varenicline, Nicotine Replacement Therapy and Bupropion. Socio-economic as well as psychological factors play an important role for smoking and smoking cessation. Heated tobacco products (like the E­cigarette) are no healthy alternative to cigarettes and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality.Moderate consumption of alcohol possibly decreases risk for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Selection bias and underreporting in studies maybe contribute to a too optimistic view. On the other hand, alcohol increases in a dose dependant fashion excess morbidity and disability adjusted life years, especially by cancer, liver diseases and infections.